Initial commit of the L'Ami Fiduciaire SaaS platform built on Laravel 12, Vue 3, Inertia.js 2, and Tailwind CSS 4. Story 0.1 (rename folders to declarations in database) is implemented and code-reviewed: migration, rollback, and 6 Pest tests all passing. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
9.1 KiB
stepsCompleted, lastStep, lastSaved
| stepsCompleted | lastStep | lastSaved |
|---|---|---|
Test Design: Epic {epic_num} - {epic_title}
Date: {date} Author: {user_name} Status: Draft / Approved
Executive Summary
Scope: {design_level} test design for Epic {epic_num}
Risk Summary:
- Total risks identified: {total_risks}
- High-priority risks (≥6): {high_priority_count}
- Critical categories: {top_categories}
Coverage Summary:
- P0 scenarios: {p0_count} ({p0_hours} hours)
- P1 scenarios: {p1_count} ({p1_hours} hours)
- P2/P3 scenarios: {p2p3_count} ({p2p3_hours} hours)
- Total effort: {total_hours} hours (~{total_days} days)
Not in Scope
| Item | Reasoning | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| {Item} | {Why excluded} | {How risk is handled} |
Risk Assessment
High-Priority Risks (Score ≥6)
| Risk ID | Category | Description | Probability | Impact | Score | Mitigation | Owner | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-001 | SEC | {description} | 2 | 3 | 6 | {mitigation} | {owner} | {date} |
| R-002 | PERF | {description} | 3 | 2 | 6 | {mitigation} | {owner} | {date} |
Medium-Priority Risks (Score 3-4)
| Risk ID | Category | Description | Probability | Impact | Score | Mitigation | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-003 | TECH | {description} | 2 | 2 | 4 | {mitigation} | {owner} |
| R-004 | DATA | {description} | 1 | 3 | 3 | {mitigation} | {owner} |
Low-Priority Risks (Score 1-2)
| Risk ID | Category | Description | Probability | Impact | Score | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-005 | OPS | {description} | 1 | 2 | 2 | Monitor |
| R-006 | BUS | {description} | 1 | 1 | 1 | Monitor |
Risk Category Legend
- TECH: Technical/Architecture (flaws, integration, scalability)
- SEC: Security (access controls, auth, data exposure)
- PERF: Performance (SLA violations, degradation, resource limits)
- DATA: Data Integrity (loss, corruption, inconsistency)
- BUS: Business Impact (UX harm, logic errors, revenue)
- OPS: Operations (deployment, config, monitoring)
Entry Criteria
- Requirements and assumptions agreed upon by QA, Dev, PM
- Test environment provisioned and accessible
- Test data available or factories ready
- Feature deployed to test environment
- {Epic-specific entry criteria}
Exit Criteria
- All P0 tests passing
- All P1 tests passing (or failures triaged)
- No open high-priority / high-severity bugs
- Test coverage agreed as sufficient
- {Epic-specific exit criteria}
Project Team (Optional)
Include only if roles/names are known or responsibility mapping is needed; otherwise omit.
| Name | Role | Testing Responsibilities |
|---|---|---|
| {Name} | QA Lead | {Responsibilities} |
| {Name} | Dev Lead | {Responsibilities} |
| {Name} | PM | {Responsibilities} |
Test Coverage Plan
P0 (Critical) - Run on every commit
Criteria: Blocks core journey + High risk (≥6) + No workaround
| Requirement | Test Level | Risk Link | Test Count | Owner | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {requirement} | E2E | R-001 | 3 | QA | {notes} |
| {requirement} | API | R-002 | 5 | QA | {notes} |
Total P0: {p0_count} tests, {p0_hours} hours
P1 (High) - Run on PR to main
Criteria: Important features + Medium risk (3-4) + Common workflows
| Requirement | Test Level | Risk Link | Test Count | Owner | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {requirement} | API | R-003 | 4 | QA | {notes} |
| {requirement} | Component | - | 6 | DEV | {notes} |
Total P1: {p1_count} tests, {p1_hours} hours
P2 (Medium) - Run nightly/weekly
Criteria: Secondary features + Low risk (1-2) + Edge cases
| Requirement | Test Level | Risk Link | Test Count | Owner | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {requirement} | API | R-004 | 8 | QA | {notes} |
| {requirement} | Unit | - | 15 | DEV | {notes} |
Total P2: {p2_count} tests, {p2_hours} hours
P3 (Low) - Run on-demand
Criteria: Nice-to-have + Exploratory + Performance benchmarks
| Requirement | Test Level | Test Count | Owner | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| {requirement} | E2E | 2 | QA | {notes} |
| {requirement} | Unit | 8 | DEV | {notes} |
Total P3: {p3_count} tests, {p3_hours} hours
Execution Order
Smoke Tests (<5 min)
Purpose: Fast feedback, catch build-breaking issues
- {scenario} (30s)
- {scenario} (45s)
- {scenario} (1min)
Total: {smoke_count} scenarios
P0 Tests (<10 min)
Purpose: Critical path validation
- {scenario} (E2E)
- {scenario} (API)
- {scenario} (API)
Total: {p0_count} scenarios
P1 Tests (<30 min)
Purpose: Important feature coverage
- {scenario} (API)
- {scenario} (Component)
Total: {p1_count} scenarios
P2/P3 Tests (<60 min)
Purpose: Full regression coverage
- {scenario} (Unit)
- {scenario} (API)
Total: {p2p3_count} scenarios
Resource Estimates
Test Development Effort
| Priority | Count | Hours/Test | Total Hours | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P0 | {p0_count} | 2.0 | {p0_hours} | Complex setup, security |
| P1 | {p1_count} | 1.0 | {p1_hours} | Standard coverage |
| P2 | {p2_count} | 0.5 | {p2_hours} | Simple scenarios |
| P3 | {p3_count} | 0.25 | {p3_hours} | Exploratory |
| Total | {total_count} | - | {total_hours} | ~{total_days} days |
Prerequisites
Test Data:
- {factory_name} factory (faker-based, auto-cleanup)
- {fixture_name} fixture (setup/teardown)
Tooling:
- {tool} for {purpose}
- {tool} for {purpose}
Environment:
- {env_requirement}
- {env_requirement}
Quality Gate Criteria
Pass/Fail Thresholds
- P0 pass rate: 100% (no exceptions)
- P1 pass rate: ≥95% (waivers required for failures)
- P2/P3 pass rate: ≥90% (informational)
- High-risk mitigations: 100% complete or approved waivers
Coverage Targets
- Critical paths: ≥80%
- Security scenarios: 100%
- Business logic: ≥70%
- Edge cases: ≥50%
Non-Negotiable Requirements
- All P0 tests pass
- No high-risk (≥6) items unmitigated
- Security tests (SEC category) pass 100%
- Performance targets met (PERF category)
Mitigation Plans
R-001: {Risk Description} (Score: 6)
Mitigation Strategy: {detailed_mitigation} Owner: {owner} Timeline: {date} Status: Planned / In Progress / Complete Verification: {how_to_verify}
R-002: {Risk Description} (Score: 6)
Mitigation Strategy: {detailed_mitigation} Owner: {owner} Timeline: {date} Status: Planned / In Progress / Complete Verification: {how_to_verify}
Assumptions and Dependencies
Assumptions
- {assumption}
- {assumption}
- {assumption}
Dependencies
- {dependency} - Required by {date}
- {dependency} - Required by {date}
Risks to Plan
- Risk: {risk_to_plan}
- Impact: {impact}
- Contingency: {contingency}
Follow-on Workflows (Manual)
- Run
*atddto generate failing P0 tests (separate workflow; not auto-run). - Run
*automatefor broader coverage once implementation exists.
Approval
Test Design Approved By:
- Product Manager: {name} Date: {date}
- Tech Lead: {name} Date: {date}
- QA Lead: {name} Date: {date}
Comments:
Interworking & Regression
| Service/Component | Impact | Regression Scope |
|---|---|---|
| {Service} | {How affected} | {Existing tests that must pass} |
Appendix
Knowledge Base References
risk-governance.md- Risk classification frameworkprobability-impact.md- Risk scoring methodologytest-levels-framework.md- Test level selectiontest-priorities-matrix.md- P0-P3 prioritization
Related Documents
- PRD: {prd_link}
- Epic: {epic_link}
- Architecture: {arch_link}
- Tech Spec: {tech_spec_link}
Generated by: BMad TEA Agent - Test Architect Module
Workflow: _bmad/tea/testarch/test-design
Version: 4.0 (BMad v6)