Files
L-Ami-Fiduciaire/_bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/nfr-assess/validation-report-20260127-102401.md.bak
Saad Ibn-Ezzoubayr 35545c2a8f feat: L'Ami Fiduciaire V1.0.0 — full codebase with Story 0.1 complete
Initial commit of the L'Ami Fiduciaire SaaS platform built on Laravel 12,
Vue 3, Inertia.js 2, and Tailwind CSS 4.

Story 0.1 (rename folders to declarations in database) is implemented and
code-reviewed: migration, rollback, and 6 Pest tests all passing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-11 23:33:10 +00:00

117 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown

---
validationDate: 2026-01-27
workflowName: testarch-nfr
workflowPath: {project-root}/src/workflows/testarch/nfr-assess
validationStatus: COMPLETE
completionDate: 2026-01-27 10:24:01
---
# Validation Report: testarch-nfr
**Validation Started:** 2026-01-27 10:24:01
**Validator:** BMAD Workflow Validation System (Codex)
**Standards Version:** BMAD Workflow Standards
## File Structure & Size
- workflow.md present: YES
- instructions.md present: YES
- workflow.yaml present: YES
- step files found: 8
**Step File Sizes:**
- steps-c/step-01-load-context.md: 77 lines [GOOD]
- steps-c/step-02-define-thresholds.md: 74 lines [GOOD]
- steps-c/step-03-gather-evidence.md: 57 lines [GOOD]
- steps-c/step-04-evaluate-and-score.md: 60 lines [GOOD]
- steps-c/step-05-generate-report.md: 63 lines [GOOD]
- steps-e/step-01-assess.md: 50 lines [GOOD]
- steps-e/step-02-apply-edit.md: 45 lines [GOOD]
- steps-v/step-01-validate.md: 52 lines [GOOD]
- workflow-plan.md present: YES
## Frontmatter Validation
- No frontmatter violations found
## Critical Path Violations
### Config Variables (Exceptions)
Standard BMAD config variables treated as valid exceptions: bmb_creations_output_folder, communication_language, document_output_language, output_folder, planning_artifacts, project-root, project_name, test_artifacts, user_name
- No {project-root} hardcoded paths detected in body
- No dead relative links detected
- No module path assumptions detected
**Status:** ✅ PASS - No critical violations
## Menu Handling Validation
- No menu structures detected (linear step flow) [N/A]
## Step Type Validation
- steps-c/step-01-load-context.md: Init [PASS]
- steps-c/step-02-define-thresholds.md: Middle [PASS]
- steps-c/step-03-gather-evidence.md: Middle [PASS]
- steps-c/step-04-evaluate-and-score.md: Middle [PASS]
- steps-c/step-05-generate-report.md: Final [PASS]
- Step type validation assumes linear sequence (no branching/menu). Workflow-plan.md present for reference. [INFO]
## Output Format Validation
- Templates present: nfr-report-template.md
- Steps with outputFile in frontmatter:
- steps-c/step-05-generate-report.md
- steps-v/step-01-validate.md
- checklist.md present: YES
## Validation Design Check
- Validation steps folder (steps-v) present: YES
- Validation step(s) present: step-01-validate.md
- Validation steps reference checklist data and auto-proceed
## Instruction Style Check
- Instruction style: Prescriptive (appropriate for TEA quality/compliance workflows)
- Steps emphasize mandatory sequence, explicit success/failure metrics, and risk-based guidance
## Collaborative Experience Check
- Overall facilitation quality: GOOD
- Steps use progressive prompts and clear role reinforcement; no laundry-list interrogation detected
- Flow progression is clear and aligned to workflow goals
## Subagent Optimization Opportunities
- No high-priority subagent optimizations identified; workflow already uses step-file architecture
- Pattern 1 (grep/regex): N/A for most steps
- Pattern 2 (per-file analysis): already aligned to validation structure
- Pattern 3 (data ops): minimal data file loads
- Pattern 4 (parallel): optional for validation only
## Cohesive Review
- Overall assessment: GOOD
- Flow is linear, goals are clear, and outputs map to TEA artifacts
- Voice and tone consistent with Test Architect persona
- Recommendation: READY (minor refinements optional)
## Plan Quality Validation
- Plan file present: workflow-plan.md
- Planned steps found: 8 (all implemented)
- Plan implementation status: Fully Implemented
## Summary
- Validation completed: 2026-01-27 10:24:01
- Critical issues: 0
- Warnings: 0 (informational notes only)
- Readiness: READY (manual review optional)