Files
L-Ami-Fiduciaire/_bmad/tea/workflows/testarch/test-design/steps-c/step-01-detect-mode.md
Saad Ibn-Ezzoubayr 35545c2a8f feat: L'Ami Fiduciaire V1.0.0 — full codebase with Story 0.1 complete
Initial commit of the L'Ami Fiduciaire SaaS platform built on Laravel 12,
Vue 3, Inertia.js 2, and Tailwind CSS 4.

Story 0.1 (rename folders to declarations in database) is implemented and
code-reviewed: migration, rollback, and 6 Pest tests all passing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-11 23:33:10 +00:00

3.5 KiB

name, description, nextStepFile, outputFile
name description nextStepFile outputFile
step-01-detect-mode Determine system-level vs epic-level mode and validate prerequisites ./step-02-load-context.md {test_artifacts}/test-design-progress.md

Step 1: Detect Mode & Prerequisites

STEP GOAL

Determine whether to run System-Level or Epic-Level test design, and confirm required inputs are available.

MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES

Universal Rules

  • 📖 Read this entire step file before taking any action
  • Speak in {communication_language}
  • 🚫 Do not load the next step until this step is complete

Role Reinforcement

  • You are the Master Test Architect
  • You prioritize risk-based, evidence-backed decisions

EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:

  • 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
  • 💾 Record outputs before proceeding
  • 📖 Load the next step only when instructed

CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:

  • Available context: config, loaded artifacts, and knowledge fragments
  • Focus: this step's goal only
  • Limits: do not execute future steps
  • Dependencies: prior steps' outputs (if any)

MANDATORY SEQUENCE

CRITICAL: Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.

1. Mode Detection (Priority Order)

A) User Intent (Highest Priority)

Use explicit intent if the user already indicates scope:

  • PRD + ADR (no epic/stories)System-Level Mode
  • Epic + Stories (no PRD/ADR)Epic-Level Mode
  • Both PRD/ADR + Epic/Stories → Prefer System-Level Mode first

If intent is unclear, ask:

"Should I create (A) System-level test design (PRD + ADR → Architecture + QA docs), or (B) Epic-level test design (Epic → single test plan)?"

B) File-Based Detection (BMad-Integrated)

If user intent is unclear:

  • If {implementation_artifacts}/sprint-status.yaml exists → Epic-Level Mode
  • Otherwise → System-Level Mode

C) Ambiguous → Ask

If mode still unclear, ask the user to choose (A) or (B) and halt until they respond.


2. Prerequisite Check (Mode-Specific)

System-Level Mode Requires:

  • PRD (functional + non-functional requirements)
  • ADR or architecture decision records
  • Architecture or tech-spec document

Epic-Level Mode Requires:

  • Epic and/or story requirements with acceptance criteria
  • Architecture context (if available)

HALT CONDITIONS

If required inputs are missing and the user cannot provide them:

  • System-Level: "Please provide PRD + ADR/architecture docs to proceed."
  • Epic-Level: "Please provide epic/story requirements or acceptance criteria to proceed."

3. Confirm Mode

State which mode you will use and why. Then proceed.


4. Save Progress

Save this step's accumulated work to {outputFile}.

  • If {outputFile} does not exist (first save), create it with YAML frontmatter:

    ---
    stepsCompleted: ['step-01-detect-mode']
    lastStep: 'step-01-detect-mode'
    lastSaved: '{date}'
    ---
    

    Then write this step's output below the frontmatter.

  • If {outputFile} already exists, update:

    • Add 'step-01-detect-mode' to stepsCompleted array (only if not already present)
    • Set lastStep: 'step-01-detect-mode'
    • Set lastSaved: '{date}'
    • Append this step's output to the appropriate section of the document.

Load next step: {nextStepFile}

🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:

SUCCESS:

  • Step completed in full with required outputs

SYSTEM FAILURE:

  • Skipped sequence steps or missing outputs Master Rule: Skipping steps is FORBIDDEN.