feat: L'Ami Fiduciaire V1.0.0 — full codebase with Story 0.1 complete

Initial commit of the L'Ami Fiduciaire SaaS platform built on Laravel 12,
Vue 3, Inertia.js 2, and Tailwind CSS 4.

Story 0.1 (rename folders to declarations in database) is implemented and
code-reviewed: migration, rollback, and 6 Pest tests all passing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-03-11 23:33:10 +00:00
commit 35545c2a8f
1517 changed files with 246774 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
---
name: 'step-e-01-discovery'
description: 'Discovery & Understanding - Understand what user wants to edit and detect PRD format'
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
altStepFile: './step-e-01b-legacy-conversion.md'
prdPurpose: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'
partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'
---
# Step E-1: Discovery & Understanding
## STEP GOAL:
Understand what the user wants to edit in the PRD, detect PRD format/type, check for validation report guidance, and route appropriately.
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
### Universal Rules:
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
### Role Reinforcement:
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring analytical expertise and improvement guidance
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and edit requirements
### Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on discovering user intent and PRD format
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make any edits yet
- 💬 Approach: Inquisitive and analytical, understanding before acting
- 🚪 This is a branch step - may route to legacy conversion
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🎯 Discover user's edit requirements
- 🎯 Auto-detect validation reports in PRD folder (use as guide)
- 🎯 Load validation report if provided (use as guide)
- 🎯 Detect PRD format (BMAD/legacy)
- 🎯 Route appropriately based on format
- 💾 Document discoveries for next step
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without understanding requirements
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Available context: PRD file to edit, optional validation report, auto-detected validation reports
- Focus: User intent discovery and format detection only
- Limits: Don't edit yet, don't validate yet
- Dependencies: None - this is first edit step
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
### 1. Load PRD Purpose Standards
Load and read the complete file at:
`{prdPurpose}` (data/prd-purpose.md)
This file defines what makes a great BMAD PRD. Internalize this understanding - it will guide improvement recommendations.
### 2. Discover PRD to Edit
"**PRD Edit Workflow**
Which PRD would you like to edit?
Please provide the path to the PRD file you want to edit."
**Wait for user to provide PRD path.**
### 3. Validate PRD Exists and Load
Once PRD path is provided:
- Check if PRD file exists at specified path
- If not found: "I cannot find a PRD at that path. Please check the path and try again."
- If found: Load the complete PRD file including frontmatter
### 4. Check for Existing Validation Report
**Check if validation report exists in the PRD folder:**
```bash
# Look for most recent validation report in the PRD folder
ls -t {prd_folder_path}/validation-report-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1
```
**If validation report found:**
Display:
"**📋 Found Validation Report**
I found a validation report from {validation_date} in the PRD folder.
This report contains findings from previous validation checks and can help guide our edits to fix known issues.
**Would you like to:**
- **[U] Use validation report** - Load it to guide and prioritize edits
- **[S] Skip** - Proceed with manual edit discovery"
**Wait for user input.**
**IF U (Use validation report):**
- Load the validation report file
- Extract findings, issues, and improvement suggestions
- Note: "Validation report loaded - will use it to guide prioritized improvements"
- Continue to step 5
**IF S (Skip) or no validation report found:**
- Note: "Proceeding with manual edit discovery"
- Continue to step 5
**If no validation report found:**
- Note: "No validation report found in PRD folder"
- Continue to step 5 without asking user
### 5. Ask About Validation Report
"**Do you have a validation report to guide edits?**
If you've run the validation workflow on this PRD, I can use that report to guide improvements and prioritize changes.
Validation report path (or type 'none'):"
**Wait for user input.**
**If validation report path provided:**
- Load the validation report
- Extract findings, severity, improvement suggestions
- Note: "Validation report loaded - will use it to guide prioritized improvements"
**If no validation report:**
- Note: "Proceeding with manual edit discovery"
- Continue to step 6
### 6. Discover Edit Requirements
"**What would you like to edit in this PRD?**
Please describe the changes you want to make. For example:
- Fix specific issues (information density, implementation leakage, etc.)
- Add missing sections or content
- Improve structure and flow
- Convert to BMAD format (if legacy PRD)
- General improvements
- Other changes
**Describe your edit goals:**"
**Wait for user to describe their requirements.**
### 7. Detect PRD Format
Analyze the loaded PRD:
**Extract all ## Level 2 headers** from PRD
**Check for BMAD PRD core sections:**
1. Executive Summary
2. Success Criteria
3. Product Scope
4. User Journeys
5. Functional Requirements
6. Non-Functional Requirements
**Classify format:**
- **BMAD Standard:** 5-6 core sections present
- **BMAD Variant:** 3-4 core sections present, generally follows BMAD patterns
- **Legacy (Non-Standard):** Fewer than 3 core sections, does not follow BMAD structure
### 8. Route Based on Format and Context
**IF validation report provided OR PRD is BMAD Standard/Variant:**
Display: "**Edit Requirements Understood**
**PRD Format:** {classification}
{If validation report: "**Validation Guide:** Yes - will use validation report findings"}
**Edit Goals:** {summary of user's requirements}
**Proceeding to deep review and analysis...**"
Read fully and follow: next step (step-e-02-review.md)
**IF PRD is Legacy (Non-Standard) AND no validation report:**
Display: "**Format Detected:** Legacy PRD
This PRD does not follow BMAD standard structure (only {count}/6 core sections present).
**Your edit goals:** {user's requirements}
**How would you like to proceed?**"
Present MENU OPTIONS below for user selection
### 9. Present MENU OPTIONS (Legacy PRDs Only)
**[C] Convert to BMAD Format** - Convert PRD to BMAD standard structure, then apply your edits
**[E] Edit As-Is** - Apply your edits without converting the format
**[X] Exit** - Exit and review conversion options
#### EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
- Only proceed based on user selection
#### Menu Handling Logic:
- IF C (Convert): Read fully and follow: {altStepFile} (step-e-01b-legacy-conversion.md)
- IF E (Edit As-Is): Display "Proceeding with edits..." then load next step
- IF X (Exit): Display summary and exit
- IF Any other: help user, then redisplay menu
---
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
### ✅ SUCCESS:
- User's edit requirements clearly understood
- Auto-detected validation reports loaded and analyzed (when found)
- Manual validation report loaded and analyzed (if provided)
- PRD format detected correctly
- BMAD PRDs proceed directly to review step
- Legacy PRDs pause and present conversion options
- User can choose conversion path or edit as-is
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Not discovering user's edit requirements
- Not auto-detecting validation reports in PRD folder
- Not loading validation report when provided (auto or manual)
- Missing format detection
- Not pausing for legacy PRDs without guidance
- Auto-proceeding without understanding intent
**Master Rule:** Understand before editing. Detect format early so we can guide users appropriately. Auto-detect and use validation reports for prioritized improvements.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
---
name: 'step-e-01b-legacy-conversion'
description: 'Legacy PRD Conversion Assessment - Analyze legacy PRD and propose conversion strategy'
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
nextStepFile: './step-e-02-review.md'
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
prdPurpose: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
---
# Step E-1B: Legacy PRD Conversion Assessment
## STEP GOAL:
Analyze legacy PRD against BMAD standards, identify gaps, propose conversion strategy, and let user choose how to proceed.
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
### Universal Rules:
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
### Role Reinforcement:
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring BMAD standards expertise and conversion guidance
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and edit requirements
### Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on conversion assessment and proposal
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to perform conversion yet (that comes in edit step)
- 💬 Approach: Analytical gap analysis with clear recommendations
- 🚪 This is a branch step - user chooses conversion path
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🎯 Analyze legacy PRD against BMAD standard
- 💾 Identify gaps and estimate conversion effort
- 📖 Present conversion options with effort estimates
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user selection
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Available context: Legacy PRD, user's edit requirements, prd-purpose standards
- Focus: Conversion assessment only (not actual conversion)
- Limits: Don't convert yet, don't validate yet
- Dependencies: Step e-01 detected legacy format and routed here
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
### 1. Attempt Sub-Process Assessment
**Try to use Task tool with sub-agent:**
"Perform legacy PRD conversion assessment:
**Load the PRD and prd-purpose.md**
**For each BMAD PRD section, analyze:**
1. Does PRD have this section? (Executive Summary, Success Criteria, Product Scope, User Journeys, Functional Requirements, Non-Functional Requirements)
2. If present: Is it complete and well-structured?
3. If missing: What content exists that could migrate to this section?
4. Effort to create/complete: Minimal / Moderate / Significant
**Identify:**
- Core sections present: {count}/6
- Content gaps in each section
- Overall conversion effort: Quick / Moderate / Substantial
- Recommended approach: Full restructuring vs targeted improvements
Return conversion assessment with gap analysis and effort estimate."
**Graceful degradation (if no Task tool):**
- Manually check PRD for each BMAD section
- Note what's present and what's missing
- Estimate conversion effort
- Identify best conversion approach
### 2. Build Gap Analysis
**For each BMAD core section:**
**Executive Summary:**
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
**Success Criteria:**
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
**Product Scope:**
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
**User Journeys:**
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
**Functional Requirements:**
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
**Non-Functional Requirements:**
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
**Overall Assessment:**
- Sections Present: {count}/6
- Total Conversion Effort: [Quick/Moderate/Substantial]
- Recommended: [Full restructuring / Targeted improvements]
### 3. Present Conversion Assessment
Display:
"**Legacy PRD Conversion Assessment**
**Current PRD Structure:**
- Core sections present: {count}/6
{List which sections are present/missing}
**Gap Analysis:**
{Present gap analysis table showing each section's status and effort}
**Overall Conversion Effort:** {effort level}
**Your Edit Goals:**
{Reiterate user's stated edit requirements}
**Recommendation:**
{Based on effort and user goals, recommend best approach}
**How would you like to proceed?**"
### 4. Present MENU OPTIONS
**[R] Restructure to BMAD** - Full conversion to BMAD format, then apply your edits
**[I] Targeted Improvements** - Apply your edits to existing structure without restructuring
**[E] Edit & Restructure** - Do both: convert format AND apply your edits
**[X] Exit** - Review assessment and decide
#### EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
- Only proceed based on user selection
#### Menu Handling Logic:
- IF R (Restructure): Note conversion mode, then load next step
- IF I (Targeted): Note targeted mode, then load next step
- IF E (Edit & Restructure): Note both mode, then load next step
- IF X (Exit): Display summary, exit
### 5. Document Conversion Strategy
Store conversion decision for next step:
- **Conversion mode:** [Full restructuring / Targeted improvements / Both]
- **Edit requirements:** [user's requirements from step e-01]
- **Gap analysis:** [summary of gaps identified]
Display: "**Conversion Strategy Documented**
Mode: {conversion mode}
Edit goals: {summary}
**Proceeding to deep review...**"
Read fully and follow: {nextStepFile} (step-e-02-review.md)
---
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
### ✅ SUCCESS:
- All 6 BMAD core sections analyzed for gaps
- Effort estimates provided for each section
- Overall conversion effort assessed correctly
- Clear recommendation provided based on effort and user goals
- User chooses conversion strategy (restructure/targeted/both)
- Conversion strategy documented for next step
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Not analyzing all 6 core sections
- Missing effort estimates
- Not providing clear recommendation
- Auto-proceeding without user selection
- Not documenting conversion strategy
**Master Rule:** Legacy PRDs need conversion assessment so users understand the work involved and can choose the best approach.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
---
name: 'step-e-02-review'
description: 'Deep Review & Analysis - Thoroughly review existing PRD and prepare detailed change plan'
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
nextStepFile: './step-e-03-edit.md'
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
validationReport: '{validation_report_path}' # If provided
prdPurpose: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'
---
# Step E-2: Deep Review & Analysis
## STEP GOAL:
Thoroughly review the existing PRD, analyze validation report findings (if provided), and prepare a detailed change plan before editing.
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
### Universal Rules:
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
### Role Reinforcement:
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring analytical expertise and improvement planning
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and approval authority
### Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on review and analysis, not editing yet
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make changes to PRD in this step
- 💬 Approach: Thorough analysis with user confirmation on plan
- 🚪 This is a middle step - user confirms plan before proceeding
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🎯 Load and analyze validation report (if provided)
- 🎯 Deep review of entire PRD
- 🎯 Map validation findings to specific sections
- 🎯 Prepare detailed change plan
- 💬 Get user confirmation on plan
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed to edit without user approval
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Available context: PRD file, validation report (if provided), user requirements from step e-01
- Focus: Analysis and planning only (no editing)
- Limits: Don't change PRD yet, don't validate yet
- Dependencies: Step e-01 completed - requirements and format known
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
### 1. Attempt Sub-Process Deep Review
**Try to use Task tool with sub-agent:**
"Perform deep PRD review and change planning:
**Context from step e-01:**
- User's edit requirements: {user_requirements}
- PRD format: {BMAD/legacy}
- Validation report provided: {yes/no}
- Conversion mode: {restructure/targeted/both} (if legacy)
**IF validation report provided:**
1. Extract all findings from validation report
2. Map findings to specific PRD sections
3. Prioritize by severity: Critical > Warning > Informational
4. For each critical issue: identify specific fix needed
5. For user's manual edit goals: identify where in PRD to apply
**IF no validation report:**
1. Read entire PRD thoroughly
2. Analyze against BMAD standards (from prd-purpose.md)
3. Identify issues in:
- Information density (anti-patterns)
- Structure and flow
- Completeness (missing sections/content)
- Measurability (unmeasurable requirements)
- Traceability (broken chains)
- Implementation leakage
4. Map user's edit goals to specific sections
**Output:**
- Section-by-section analysis
- Specific changes needed for each section
- Prioritized action list
- Recommended order for applying changes
Return detailed change plan with section breakdown."
**Graceful degradation (if no Task tool):**
- Manually read PRD sections
- Manually analyze validation report findings (if provided)
- Build section-by-section change plan
- Prioritize changes by severity/user goals
### 2. Build Change Plan
**Organize by PRD section:**
**For each section (in order):**
- **Current State:** Brief description of what exists
- **Issues Identified:** [List from validation report or manual analysis]
- **Changes Needed:** [Specific changes required]
- **Priority:** [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
- **User Requirements Met:** [Which user edit goals address this section]
**Include:**
- Sections to add (if missing)
- Sections to update (if present but needs work)
- Content to remove (if incorrect/leakage)
- Structure changes (if reformatting needed)
### 3. Prepare Change Plan Summary
**Summary sections:**
**Changes by Type:**
- **Additions:** {count} sections to add
- **Updates:** {count} sections to update
- **Removals:** {count} items to remove
- **Restructuring:** {yes/no} if format conversion needed
**Priority Distribution:**
- **Critical:** {count} changes (must fix)
- **High:** {count} changes (important)
- **Medium:** {count} changes (nice to have)
- **Low:** {count} changes (optional)
**Estimated Effort:**
[Quick/Moderate/Substantial] based on scope and complexity
### 4. Present Change Plan to User
Display:
"**Deep Review Complete - Change Plan**
**PRD Analysis:**
{Brief summary of PRD current state}
{If validation report provided:}
**Validation Findings:**
{count} issues identified: {critical} critical, {warning} warnings
**Your Edit Requirements:**
{summary of what user wants to edit}
**Proposed Change Plan:**
**By Section:**
{Present section-by-section breakdown}
**By Priority:**
- Critical: {count} items
- High: {count} items
- Medium: {count} items
**Estimated Effort:** {effort level}
**Questions:**
1. Does this change plan align with what you had in mind?
2. Any sections I should add/remove/reprioritize?
3. Any concerns before I proceed with edits?
**Review the plan and let me know if you'd like any adjustments.**"
### 5. Get User Confirmation
Wait for user to review and provide feedback.
**If user wants adjustments:**
- Discuss requested changes
- Revise change plan accordingly
- Represent for confirmation
**If user approves:**
- Note: "Change plan approved. Proceeding to edit step."
- Continue to step 6
### 6. Document Approved Plan
Store approved change plan for next step:
- **Approved changes:** Section-by-section list
- **Priority order:** Sequence to apply changes
- **User confirmed:** Yes
Display: "**Change Plan Approved**
{Brief summary of approved plan}
**Proceeding to edit step...**"
Read fully and follow: {nextStepFile} (step-e-03-edit.md)
### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS (If User Wants Discussion)
**[A] Advanced Elicitation** - Get additional perspectives on change plan
**[P] Party Mode** - Discuss with team for more ideas
**[C] Continue to Edit** - Proceed with approved plan
#### EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
- Only proceed to edit when user selects 'C'
#### Menu Handling Logic:
- IF A: Read fully and follow: {advancedElicitationTask}, then return to discussion
- IF P: Read fully and follow: {partyModeWorkflow}, then return to discussion
- IF C: Document approval, then load {nextStepFile}
- IF Any other: discuss, then redisplay menu
---
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
### ✅ SUCCESS:
- Validation report findings fully analyzed (if provided)
- Deep PRD review completed systematically
- Change plan built section-by-section
- Changes prioritized by severity/user goals
- User presented with clear plan
- User confirms or adjusts plan
- Approved plan documented for next step
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Not analyzing validation report findings (if provided)
- Superficial review instead of deep analysis
- Missing section-by-section breakdown
- Not prioritizing changes
- Proceeding without user approval
**Master Rule:** Plan before editing. Thorough analysis ensures we make the right changes in the right order. User approval prevents misalignment.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
---
name: 'step-e-03-edit'
description: 'Edit & Update - Apply changes to PRD following approved change plan'
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
nextStepFile: './step-e-04-complete.md'
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
prdPurpose: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
---
# Step E-3: Edit & Update
## STEP GOAL:
Apply changes to the PRD following the approved change plan from step e-02, including content updates, structure improvements, and format conversion if needed.
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
### Universal Rules:
- 🛑 ALWAYS generate content WITH user input/approval
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
### Role Reinforcement:
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring analytical expertise and precise editing skills
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and approval authority
### Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on implementing approved changes from step e-02
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make changes beyond the approved plan
- 💬 Approach: Methodical, section-by-section execution
- 🚪 This is a middle step - user can request adjustments
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🎯 Follow approved change plan systematically
- 💾 Edit PRD content according to plan
- 📖 Update frontmatter as needed
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without completion
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Available context: PRD file, approved change plan from step e-02, prd-purpose standards
- Focus: Implementing changes from approved plan only
- Limits: Don't add changes beyond plan, don't validate yet
- Dependencies: Step e-02 completed - plan approved by user
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
### 1. Retrieve Approved Change Plan
From step e-02, retrieve:
- **Approved changes:** Section-by-section list
- **Priority order:** Sequence to apply changes
- **User requirements:** Edit goals from step e-01
Display: "**Starting PRD Edits**
**Change Plan:** {summary}
**Total Changes:** {count}
**Estimated Effort:** {effort level}
**Proceeding with edits section by section...**"
### 2. Attempt Sub-Process Edits (For Complex Changes)
**Try to use Task tool with sub-agent for major sections:**
"Execute PRD edits for {section_name}:
**Context:**
- Section to edit: {section_name}
- Current content: {existing content}
- Changes needed: {specific changes from plan}
- BMAD PRD standards: Load from prd-purpose.md
**Tasks:**
1. Read current PRD section
2. Apply specified changes
3. Ensure BMAD PRD principles compliance:
- High information density (no filler)
- Measurable requirements
- Clear structure
- Proper markdown formatting
4. Return updated section content
Apply changes and return updated section."
**Graceful degradation (if no Task tool):**
- Perform edits directly in current context
- Load PRD section, apply changes, save
### 3. Execute Changes Section-by-Section
**For each section in approved plan (in priority order):**
**a) Load current section**
- Read the current PRD section content
- Note what exists
**b) Apply changes per plan**
- Additions: Create new sections with proper content
- Updates: Modify existing content per plan
- Removals: Remove specified content
- Restructuring: Reformat content to BMAD standard
**c) Update PRD file**
- Apply changes to PRD
- Save updated PRD
- Verify changes applied correctly
**Display progress after each section:**
"**Section Updated:** {section_name}
Changes: {brief summary}
{More sections remaining...}"
### 4. Handle Restructuring (If Needed)
**If conversion mode is "Full restructuring" or "Both":**
**For restructuring:**
- Reorganize PRD to BMAD standard structure
- Ensure proper ## Level 2 headers
- Reorder sections logically
- Update PRD frontmatter to match BMAD format
**Follow BMAD PRD structure:**
1. Executive Summary
2. Success Criteria
3. Product Scope
4. User Journeys
5. Domain Requirements (if applicable)
6. Innovation Analysis (if applicable)
7. Project-Type Requirements
8. Functional Requirements
9. Non-Functional Requirements
Display: "**PRD Restructured**
BMAD standard structure applied.
{Sections added/reordered}"
### 5. Update PRD Frontmatter
**Ensure frontmatter is complete and accurate:**
```yaml
---
workflowType: 'prd'
workflow: 'create' # or 'validate' or 'edit'
classification:
domain: '{domain}'
projectType: '{project_type}'
complexity: '{complexity}'
inputDocuments: [list of input documents]
stepsCompleted: ['step-e-01-discovery', 'step-e-02-review', 'step-e-03-edit']
lastEdited: '{current_date}'
editHistory:
- date: '{current_date}'
changes: '{summary of changes}'
---
```
**Update frontmatter accordingly.**
### 6. Final Review of Changes
**Load complete updated PRD**
**Verify:**
- All approved changes applied correctly
- PRD structure is sound
- No unintended modifications
- Frontmatter is accurate
**If issues found:**
- Fix them now
- Note corrections made
**If user wants adjustments:**
- Accept feedback and make adjustments
- Re-verify after adjustments
### 7. Confirm Completion
Display:
"**PRD Edits Complete**
**Changes Applied:** {count} sections modified
**PRD Updated:** {prd_file_path}
**Summary of Changes:**
{Brief bullet list of major changes}
**PRD is ready for:**
- Use in downstream workflows (UX, Architecture)
- Validation (if not yet validated)
**What would you like to do next?**"
### 8. Present MENU OPTIONS
**[V] Run Validation** - Execute full validation workflow (steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md)
**[S] Summary Only** - End with summary of changes (no validation)
**[A] Adjust** - Make additional edits
**[X] Exit** - Exit edit workflow
#### EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
- Only proceed based on user selection
#### Menu Handling Logic:
- IF V (Validate): Display "Starting validation workflow..." then read fully and follow: steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md
- IF S (Summary): Present edit summary and exit
- IF A (Adjust): Accept additional requirements, loop back to editing
- IF X (Exit): Display summary and exit
---
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
### ✅ SUCCESS:
- All approved changes from step e-02 applied correctly
- Changes executed in planned priority order
- Restructuring completed (if needed)
- Frontmatter updated accurately
- Final verification confirms changes
- User can proceed to validation or exit with summary
- Option to run validation seamlessly integrates edit and validate modes
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Making changes beyond approved plan
- Not following priority order
- Missing restructuring (if conversion mode)
- Not updating frontmatter
- No final verification
- Not saving updated PRD
**Master Rule:** Execute the plan exactly as approved. PRD is now ready for validation or downstream use. Validation integration ensures quality.

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
---
name: 'step-e-04-complete'
description: 'Complete & Validate - Present options for next steps including full validation'
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
validationWorkflow: '../steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md'
---
# Step E-4: Complete & Validate
## STEP GOAL:
Present summary of completed edits and offer next steps including seamless integration with validation workflow.
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
### Universal Rules:
- 🛑 ALWAYS generate content WITH user input/approval
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
### Role Reinforcement:
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring synthesis and summary expertise
- ✅ User chooses next actions
### Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on presenting summary and options
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make additional changes
- 💬 Approach: Clear, concise summary with actionable options
- 🚪 This is the final edit step - no more edits
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🎯 Compile summary of all changes made
- 🎯 Present options clearly with expected outcomes
- 📖 Route to validation if user chooses
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user selection
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Available context: Updated PRD file, edit history from step e-03
- Focus: Summary and options only (no more editing)
- Limits: Don't make changes, just present options
- Dependencies: Step e-03 completed - all edits applied
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
### 1. Compile Edit Summary
From step e-03 change execution, compile:
**Changes Made:**
- Sections added: {list with names}
- Sections updated: {list with names}
- Content removed: {list}
- Structure changes: {description}
**Edit Details:**
- Total sections affected: {count}
- Mode: {restructure/targeted/both}
- Priority addressed: {Critical/High/Medium/Low}
**PRD Status:**
- Format: {BMAD Standard / BMAD Variant / Legacy (converted)}
- Completeness: {assessment}
- Ready for: {downstream use cases}
### 2. Present Completion Summary
Display:
"**✓ PRD Edit Complete**
**Updated PRD:** {prd_file_path}
**Changes Summary:**
{Present bulleted list of major changes}
**Edit Mode:** {mode}
**Sections Modified:** {count}
**PRD Format:** {format}
**PRD is now ready for:**
- Downstream workflows (UX Design, Architecture)
- Validation to ensure quality
- Production use
**What would you like to do next?**"
### 3. Present MENU OPTIONS
Display:
**[V] Run Full Validation** - Execute complete validation workflow (steps-v) to verify PRD quality
**[E] Edit More** - Make additional edits to the PRD
**[S] Summary** - End with detailed summary of changes
**[X] Exit** - Exit edit workflow
#### EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
- Only proceed based on user selection
#### Menu Handling Logic:
- **IF V (Run Full Validation):**
- Display: "**Starting Validation Workflow**"
- Display: "This will run all 13 validation checks on the updated PRD."
- Display: "Preparing to validate: {prd_file_path}"
- Display: "**Proceeding to validation...**"
- Read fully and follow: {validationWorkflow} (steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md)
- Note: This hands off to the validation workflow which will run its complete 13-step process
- **IF E (Edit More):**
- Display: "**Additional Edits**"
- Ask: "What additional edits would you like to make?"
- Accept input, then display: "**Returning to edit step...**"
- Read fully and follow: step-e-03-edit.md again
- **IF S (Summary):**
- Display detailed summary including:
- Complete list of all changes made
- Before/after comparison (key improvements)
- Recommendations for next steps
- Display: "**Edit Workflow Complete**"
- Exit
- **IF X (Exit):**
- Display summary
- Display: "**Edit Workflow Complete**"
- Exit
- **IF Any other:** Help user, then redisplay menu
---
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
### ✅ SUCCESS:
- Complete edit summary compiled accurately
- All changes clearly documented
- Options presented with clear expectations
- Validation option seamlessly integrates with steps-v workflow
- User can validate, edit more, or exit
- Clean handoff to validation workflow (if chosen)
- Edit workflow completes properly
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Missing changes in summary
- Not offering validation option
- Not documenting completion properly
- No clear handoff to validation workflow
**Master Rule:** Edit workflow seamlessly integrates with validation. User can edit → validate → edit again → validate again in iterative improvement cycle.